Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Paul L. WORLEY v. Phyllis R. WORLEY.

SIMPSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Colbert Law and Equity Court adjudging the appellant in contempt of court for the failure to pay alimony and medical expenses to his divorced wife.

The appellee filed a petition to have appellant show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failure to pay certain drug bills and alimony. The appellant filed an answer which he labeled a cross-bill seeking relief from such payments on the ground of inability to pay. After taking testimony, the lower court entered a decree holding appellant in contempt and committing him to the county jail. From this decree the appellant appealed.

The appeal must be dismissed. The proper method of review of a contempt proceeding is by certiorari if the party is not in prison (Jordan v. Jordan, Ala. 1957, 96 So.2d 809.; Ex parte National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, 265 Ala. 356, 91 So.2d 220), or by habeas corpus if the party is in prison. Wetzel v. Bessemer Bar Ass'n, 242 Ala. 164, 5 So.2d 722. See also 4 Ala.Dig., Contempt, 66(1), 67; 11 Ala.Dig., Habeas Corpus, 22(2).

266 Ala. 386.

Appeal dismissed.

LAWSON, GOODWYN, and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WORLEY v. WORLEY
(Jan 23, 1958)