Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BULLOCH COUNTY v. RITZERT.

DUCKWORTH, Chief Justice.

1. Mandamus will lie to compel public officers to perform specific acts where the law requires performance thereof as a clear legal duty. Code §§ 64-101, 23-1701; Graham v. Beacham, 189 Ga. 304 ( 5 S.E.2d 775); Hartsfield v. Salem, 213 Ga. 760 ( 101 S.E.2d 701).

2. But the writ of mandamus is personal and issues to the individual to compel performance, and it does not reach the office but is directed against the officer to compel him to perform the required legal duty. 34 Am. Jur. 812, § 7; Bryant v. Mitchell, 195 Ga. 135 ( 23 S.E.2d 410); McCallum v. Bryan, 213 Ga. 669 ( 100 S.E.2d 916). Therefore, the petition brought against Bulloch County to require it to record a contract on the minutes of the Board of Commissioners thereof was subject to the general demurrer and did not allege a cause of action, since it was brought against the county and not the proper officials required by law to perform the specified act. The court erred in overruling the general demurrer to the petition. This rendered nugatory the final order making the mandamus absolute.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 13, 1958 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 10, 1958.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BULLOCH COUNTY v. RITZERT
(Feb 10, 1958)