THE MUTER COMPANY v. THE MAGNAVOX COMPANY

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 13236.

Attorney(S)

Bates, Teare McBean, Cleveland, Ohio (argued by Albert R. Teare, Cleveland, Ohio), for
Oberlin Limbach, Cleveland, Ohio, Lockwood, Galt, Woodard Smith, Indianapolis,
(argued by Arthur A. Smith, Indianapolis,
), for

Judges

Florence Ellinwood Allen
John Donelson Martin
Thomas Francis McAllister

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 13236.

Attorney(S)

Bates, Teare McBean, Cleveland, Ohio (argued by Albert R. Teare, Cleveland, Ohio), for
Oberlin Limbach, Cleveland, Ohio, Lockwood, Galt, Woodard Smith, Indianapolis,
(argued by Arthur A. Smith, Indianapolis,
), for

Judges

Florence Ellinwood Allen
John Donelson Martin
Thomas Francis McAllister

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

THE MUTER COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. THE MAGNAVOX COMPANY et al., Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court, 160 F. Supp. 169, is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of the District Court and upon the authority of Barber-Coleman Company v. A.G. Redmond Company, 6 Cir., 94 F.2d 717.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

THE MUTER COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. THE MAGNAVOX COMPANY et al., Appellees.

Comments