Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CANTEEN CO. ET AL., APPELLEES v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT.

Taxation — Listing personal property — Equipment used in manufacturing — Person making and dispensing beverages by automatic machine a manufacturer — Sections 5711.16 and 5711.22, Revised Code.

Per Curiam.

This court is of the opinion that the appellees, in their beverage business as above described, are "manufacturers" within the meaning of that term as used in Sections 5711.16 and 5711.22, Revised Code, and are entitled to have their above-described machines, used in such business, listed, for the purpose of taxation, at 50 per cent of their true value.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed on authority of Jer-Zee, Inc., v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 163 Ohio St. 31, 125 N.E.2d 195.

Decision affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CANTEEN CO. v. BOWERS
(Mar 12, 1958)