AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. v. KENOSHA

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 343.

Attorney(S)

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, John N. Stull, A. F. Prescott
H. Eugene Heine, Jr. for the United States,
Alfred E. LaFrance for the American Motors Corporation,
Wm. J. P. Abert
Robert V. Baker for

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 343.

Attorney(S)

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, John N. Stull, A. F. Prescott
H. Eugene Heine, Jr. for the United States,
Alfred E. LaFrance for the American Motors Corporation,
Wm. J. P. Abert
Robert V. Baker for

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. ET AL. v. CITY OF KENOSHA.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, MR. JUSTICE BURTON, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent for the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinions in City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U.S. 489, 495, 505, 511, decided March 3, 1958.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.