Arbitration — Award — Finality.
In this action of assumpsit by a former employe against his former employer, in which plaintiff claimed that he was a third party beneficiary of a collective bargaining agreement between the defendant and the union of which plaintiff was a member and that he had been discharged in violation of this agreement; and it appeared from the pleadings that the collective bargaining agreement provided for a grievance and arbitration procedure and that an impartial arbitrator selected pursuant to the agreement had found that the discharge of the plaintiff was justified and that he was not entitled to reinstatement, it was Held that (1) the decision of the arbitrator was conclusive and (2) the court below had properly entered judgment on the pleadings for the defendant.
OPINION PER CURIAM, March 17, 1958:
The judgment of the Court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge REIMEL of the Court of Common Pleas No. 5 of Philadelphia County, reported in 11 Pa. D. C.2d 459.