HELENE CURTIS INDUSTRIES v. SALES AFFILIATES

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 24524-24527.

Attorney(S)

Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City (Bruce Bromley, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs. Halpin, Keogh St. John, New York City (Eugene J. Keogh, New York City, of counsel), for Sales Affiliates, Inc. Kenyon Kenyon, New York City (Theodore S. Kenyon, New York City, of counsel), for Helene Curtis Industries, Inc., et al. Henry B. Ashton, New York City (Edgar H. Kent and Rynn Berry, New York City, of counsel), for The Gillette Co. Hawkins, Delafield Wood, New York City (Clarence Fried, New York City, of counsel), for Skillern Sons, Inc., et al.

Judges

Carroll Clark Hincks
Joseph Edward Lumbard

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 24524-24527.

Attorney(S)

Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City (Bruce Bromley, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs. Halpin, Keogh St. John, New York City (Eugene J. Keogh, New York City, of counsel), for Sales Affiliates, Inc. Kenyon Kenyon, New York City (Theodore S. Kenyon, New York City, of counsel), for Helene Curtis Industries, Inc., et al. Henry B. Ashton, New York City (Edgar H. Kent and Rynn Berry, New York City, of counsel), for The Gillette Co. Hawkins, Delafield Wood, New York City (Clarence Fried, New York City, of counsel), for Skillern Sons, Inc., et al.

Judges

Carroll Clark Hincks
Joseph Edward Lumbard

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

HELENE CURTIS INDUSTRIES, Inc., and Helene Curtis Sales, Inc., Plaintiffs, C.V. Layden, doing business as Southwestern Beauty Products Company, Plaintiff-Inter v. ner,

HINCKS and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.

The motion to recall the mandate and clarify the opinion and judgment is denied, the moving party to pay the costs of printing the plaintiffs' brief. There is no merit whatsoever to the contention of the defendant Sales Affiliates, Inc. Judge Kaufman, D.C., 159 F. Supp. 582, has correctly interpreted our opinion and it needs no clarification. This is the second such motion to delay the proceedings. It is desirable that the District Court proceed forthwith in accordance with our opinion, 247 F.2d 940, filed on September 5, 1957.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

HELENE CURTIS INDUSTRIES, Inc., and Helene Curtis Sales, Inc., Plaintiffs, C.V. Layden, doing business as Southwestern Beauty Products Company, Plaintiff-Inter v. ner,

Comments