Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of A. PAUL GOLDBLUM, Appellant-Respondent, against JAMES M. POWER et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and THOMAS A. DUFFY et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Order of the Appellate Division modified, insofar as it holds the designating petitions void in part for failure to designate candidates for County Committeemen separately by sexes, and as to that question order reversed and proceeding dismissed and, as so modified, order in all other respects affirmed. We hold that the form of these petitions meets the requirements of section 12 of the Election Law since they adequately disclose which candidates are male and which are female only. No opinion.

Concur: Judges DESMOND, DYE, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, BEGAN, MacAFFERfn_ and TAYLORfn_.

Designated pursuant to section 5 of article VI of the State Constitution in the temporary absence of Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges FULD and FROESSEL.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF GOLDBLUM v. POWER
(Aug 7, 1958)