Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KOVRAK v. GINSBURG ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF THE LAW.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 392 Pa. 143, 139 A.2d 889.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KOVRAK v. GINSBURG
(Oct 20, 1958)