Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

CONCETTA CARDOSANTO, Appellant v. ESTELLE M. CARDOSANTO, Respondent

Per Curiam.

This proceeding was properly brought under subdivision 8 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. Upon due notice of revocation of the license of the occupant, the landlord became entitled to possession of the premises.

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to landlord, and final order directed for the landlord as prayed for in the petition, with appropriate costs in the court below. Issuance of warrant stayed to and including November 30, 1958.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARDOSANTO v. CARDOSANTO
(Oct 24, 1958)