MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — Not Responsible For Acts Of Police Officers Exercising Police Power Of State — Rule Applied To Fatal Shooting By Police Officer Of Baltimore County. Police officers, exercising directly the police power of the state, are governmental agents, their duties are of a public nature, they are not municipal servants or agents, whether appointed by the municipality or not, and municipalities for which they are appointed are not responsible for their acts or omissions as police officers, whether done or omitted under a public law or a municipal ordinance. In the instant case, it was held that Baltimore County was not responsible for a fatal shooting by a police officer employed by its police department. pp. 272-273
Decided November 20, 1958.
HENDERSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
This appeal is from a judgment for costs entered in favor of the defendant, appellee, Baltimore County, after a demurrer filed by it had been sustained without leave to amend. The declaration, in two counts, alleged that Clarence Wilkerson had been fatally shot by the defendant, Louis DeManss, a police officer, "regularly employed as an agent, employee and servant of the Police Department of Baltimore County", and that the shooting was "in reckless disregard of human life and discarding those precautions proper to the circumstances," and "without justification or excuse". The trial court held that the County was not liable for the alleged tort of the police officer, because it was exercising a governmental function when it employed him.
We think the Maryland law on the point was settled in the case of Wynkoop v. Hagerstown, 159 Md. 194. The rule there stated is supported by the great weight of authority. See Borchard, Government Liability in Tort, 34 Yale Law Journ. 229, 240; Prosser, Torts (2d ed.) § 109; Restatement of Torts, sec. 887, comment (c) and sec. 888, comment (c); 18 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3d ed.) §§ 53.79, 53.80. We find no merit in the appellants' argument that Baltimore County somehow stands in a different position because of the adoption of its present Charter under Article XI-A of the Maryland Constitution, and Code (1957), Art. 25A, § 1. If, as the appellants argue, the rule ought to be changed so as to enlarge the liability of municipal corporations, it must be done by the Legislature and not by this Court. Baltimore v. State, 173 Md. 267, 273; Cox v. Anne Arundel County, 181 Md. 428, 433. Cf. Howard v. South Balto. Gen. Hosp., 191 Md. 617, 619; and Thomas v. Prince George's County, 200 Md. 554, 559.
Judgment affirmed, costs to be paid by the appellants.