Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

GARRETT v. BYNUM

AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries resulting from a collision between plaintiff's and defendant's automobiles at the intersection of two rural roads. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant was negligent in several particulars, including the usual allegations with respect to lookout, control, yielding the right of way, and improperly turning at an intersection. The defendant alleged that the plaintiff failed to keep a proper lookout, drove his automobile at an unreasonable speed, and failed to yield the right of way. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff assigns as error the trial court's refusal to give certain requested instructions and the failure to give certain necessary instructions. The instructions given to the jury fully covered the issues raised in the pleadings. The instructions included the appropriate statements of the law relating to each of the allegations of negligence and contributory negligence. A party is entitled to have the theory of his case presented to the jury. Cline v. Bush, 152 Or. 63, 52 P.2d 652 (1935). He is not entitled to anything more than this. Denton v. Arnstein, 197 Or. 28, 250 P.2d 407 (1952). The instructions given in this case were wholly adequate to present the theory of the plaintiff's case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GARRETT v. BYNUM
(Dec 3, 1958)