Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Genkinger v. New Castle City, Appellant.

Insurance — Bonds — Rates — Challenge in action for premium — City treasurer's bond — Resolution approving bond but directing payment of lower premium.

In an action by plaintiffs to recover from defendant city the premium on a bond purchased from plaintiffs by the city treasurer, in which it appeared that the bond was valid and that the premium charge for it was in conformity with the rates filed by the insurer and approved by the insurance commission; that the city council by resolution had approved the bond but directed that the premium paid thereon should be in a specified reduced amount; and that the court below, holding that defendant could not in the instant proceeding contest the premium rates involved, entered an order sustaining plaintiffs' demurrer to defendant's answer; it was Held that the order of the court below should be affirmed.

Argued November 14, 1958.

OPINION PER CURIAM, December 9, 1958:

The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge LAMOREE, as reported in 14 Pa. D. C. 2d 719.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GENKINGER v. NEW CASTLE CITY
(Dec 9, 1958)