Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DAVID HARRIS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

STURGIS, C.J., and CARROLL, DONALD, and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM.

On Application for Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

Florida Appellate Rule 3.14, subd. a, 31 F.S.A., provides:

"a. Time For. Unless further time is allowed, rehearings must be applied for by petition in writing within 15 days after the filing of the decision or order of the Court."

The decision herein was filed November 20, 1958, and no extension of time was applied for or allowed under the rule. Appellant filed a petition for rehearing on December 10, 1958, which is four days after the expiration of the 15-day period, and appellee has moved to dismiss same on the ground that it was not filed within the time prescribed by the rule. We treat that motion as a motion to strike the petition.

There must be a conclusion to all litigation. The cited rule was designed to produce that result and is to be strictly construed with that purpose in mind. Only upon a timely showing of good cause will the period allowed for filing an application for rehearing be extended.

The decision in this cause therefore became final prior to the filing of the application for rehearing and appellant has neither shown nor attempted to show any cause whatever for failure to file the application within the 15-day period prescribed by the rule. The motion to strike the application for rehearing is well founded and an order will be entered accordingly.

STURGIS, C.J., and CARROLL, DONALD, and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HARRIS v. STATE
(Dec 16, 1958)