AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ARMOUR COMPANY, Libelant-Appellee, v. COMPANIA ARGENTINA DE NAVEGACION DODERO, S.A., Respondent-Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal respondent challenges only certain findings of fact of the trial court, made as a part of a reasoned opinion. Such findings may be upset only if clearly erroneous. F.R. 52 (a); McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20; A.H. Bull S.S. Co. v. The Exanthia, 2 Cir., 234 F.2d 650, 653; Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. The Saturnia, 2 Cir., 226 F.2d 147, 149; Union Carbide Carbon Corp. v. United States, 2 Cir., 200 F.2d 908, 910. And we find each of them supported by ample evidence.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARMOUR v. COMPANIA ARGENTINA DE NAV. D., S.A
(Feb 4, 1959)