AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

HAZEL F. BITTSON, Respondent, v. ANTHONY J. BITTSON, Appellant.

Appeal from an order denying, without a hearing, appellant's application to modify a judgment of separation by eliminating the award of alimony to respondent and to direct the custodian-receiver to pay appellant the income from certain property. Order reversed, without costs, and application remitted to the Special Term for determination after a hearing. Appellant is not prevented from applying for a reduction in alimony because of arrears. ( Mandel v. Mandel, 241 App. Div. 882; Staples v. Staples, 206 App. Div. 196; Wiseman v. Wiseman, 172 Misc. 114; Schacknow v. Schacknow, 146 Misc. 6.) The questions as to the present financial status of the parties and whether there has been a change of circumstances since the entry of the judgment of separation in December, 1954 should be determined after a hearing. Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BITTSON v. BITTSON
(Jan 26, 1959)