Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE SUBLETT: SUBLETT, APPELLANT v. HALL, SHERIFF, APPELLEE.

Appeal — No bill of exceptions — Judgment not disturbed by reviewing court, when — Habeas corpus.

Per Curiam.

The cause has been submitted on the transcript of docket and journal entries and the original papers filed in the Court of Appeals. There being no bill of exceptions, this court cannot say that there was no substantial evidence warranting the Court of Appeals in reaching the conclusion it did. On appeal on questions of law, all reasonable presumptions consistent with the record will be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment under review and of the regularity and legality of the proceeding below.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RESSUBLETT
(Mar 18, 1959)