Mandamus — Scope of action — Use to enforce zoning ordinance — Availability of other remedy.
In this action of mandamus against a zoning board of adjustment and a building inspector of a first class township to compel them to enforce the provisions of the zoning ordinance by requiring the removal of a building violating the ordinance and in which it appeared that under the terms of the township zoning ordinance the plaintiff had another adequate, appropriate and specific remedy to enforce his rights, it was Held that plaintiff could not maintain an action of mandamus.
OPINION PER CURIAM, March 16, 1959:
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge FORREST for the court below, reported at 16 Pa. D. C.2d 243.
Judgment affirmed.