Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLEE v. KING, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No constitutional question raised in lower courts — Criminal law — Municipal ordinance — Prohibiting possession of obscene literature — Evidence — Obscenity — Criteria.

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no constitutional question was raised in the lower courts.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CINCINNATI v. KING
(Mar 25, 1959)