Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TEXAS OSAGE COOPERATIVE ROYALTY POOL, et al., Petitioners, v. Van CLARK, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is found in Tex.Civ.App., 314 S.W.2d 109.

In its opinion the Court of Civil Appeals has held that the quoted language contained in the deed from Emil Zoch and wife, Lydia Zoch, to T. Fred Evins, et al., trustees, dated September 9, 1930 ( 314 S.W.2d 111), under which petitioners claim title did not give respondent, Van Clark, notice of petitioners' claim of title to an interest in the minerals in the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of Section No. 42 in Block 1, R. M. Thompson original grantee. We are not satisfied that the opinion in that respect has correctly declared the law. We are satisfied, however, that the application for writ of error filed herein presents no error which requires reversal of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals. Accordingly, the application for writ of error is 'Refused. No Reversible Error.' Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TEXAS OSAGE CO-OP ROYALTY POOL v. CLARK
(Apr 15, 1959)