Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

META ENSLEIN, Respondent, v. HUDSON MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant-Respondent, and PEELLE COMPANY, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against both defendants and with costs to defendant Hudson Manhattan Railroad Company against defendant, the Peelle Company. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ENSLEIN v. HUDSON MANHATTAN R.R. CO
(Apr 9, 1959)