Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, v. E.B. HULLEY AND BESS M. HULLEY, HIS WIFE; H.P. EFFROSS AND DOROTHY EFFROSS, HIS WIFE; JAMES O. LEWIS; C. GLOW; LOUIS LACKEY AND JOSEPH KATZ, A CO-PARTNERSHIP D/B/A PASADENA MATERIAL CO.; HAROLD C. ANDERSON LUMBER CO., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION; R. MALCOLM WHITWORTH, JR.; BURFORD DISTRIBUTING CO., A CORPORATION; ALBERT SHEROUSE; AND JOHN H. SQUIRES, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of this court was entered on April 16, 1958, affirming, on authority of United States v. Griffin-Moore Lumber Co., Inc., Fla., 62 So.2d 589, the decree of the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida, in the above styled cause. Said judgment was, on petition for writ of certiorari, reversed and remanded by the Supreme Court of the United States on authority of United States v. Security Trust Savings Bank, 340 U.S. 47, 71 S.Ct. 111, 95 L.Ed. 53; United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc., 345 U.S. 361, 73 S.Ct. 701, 97 L.Ed. 1071; United States v. City of New Britain, 347 U.S. 81, 74 S.Ct. 367, 98 L.Ed. 520; United States v. Acri, 348 U.S. 211, 75 S.Ct. 239, 99 L.Ed. 264; United States v. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co., 348 U.S. 215, 75 S.Ct. 247, 99 L.Ed. 268; United States v. Scovil, 348 U.S. 218, 75 S.Ct. 244, 99 L.Ed. 271; United States v. Colotta, 350 U.S. 808, 76 S.Ct. 82, 100 L.Ed. 725; United States v. White Bear Brewing Co. Inc., 350 U.S. 1010, 76 S.Ct. 646, 100 L.Ed. 871; United States v. Vorreiter, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 19, 2 L.Ed.2d 23.

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment of this court in said cause be, and is now, reconsidered and said cause hereby remanded to the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County for further proceedings consistent with the laws of the State of Florida and the mandate and opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, issued in this case.

THOMAS, HOBSON, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.

TERRELL, C.J., dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. HULLEY
(Apr 17, 1959)