Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

VICTORY EXPRESS, INC., APPELLEE v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT.

Taxation — Sales tax — Exception — Motor transportation equipment — Purchased to use in public utility service — Purchaser not public utility at time of purchase — Section 5739.01, Revised Code.

Per Curiam.

It is clear from the record that in March 1957 there was a "sale," within the meaning of Section 5739.01, Revised Code, of the motor equipment in question and a transfer of title thereto to appellee, at which time appellee was not a certificated operator authorized to engage in public utility service but did intend to so engage as soon as it was authorized. It is the purposed use of the equipment by the consumer or user that is determinative of the question of tax exception. The fact that Schaefer individually used the equipment in public utility service for a time after the sale does not deprive it of its excepted status. It was at no time used for any purpose or in any manner other than in public utility service, and it was never the purpose of the consumer to otherwise use it.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. See State, ex rel. Paul Stutler, Inc., v. Yacobucci, Clerk, ante, 20.

Decision affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.

PECK, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EXPRESS, INC. v. BOWERS
(May 13, 1959)