Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Warren R. HAWKINS et al., Appellants, v. Lillie Mae HOSKINSON, Appellee.

BIRD, Judge.

This action involves priority of liens. It will be unnecessary, however, to discuss the merits of the case.

Appellants designated a partial record for the purpose of appeal and did not serve a concise statement of points on which they intended to rely. Appellee contends that the appeal should therefore be dismissed. Civil Rule 75.04 provides as follows:

"No assignment of errors is necessary. If the appellant does not designate for inclusion the complete record and all the proceedings and evidence in the action, he shall serve with his designation a concise statement of the points on which he intends to rely on the appeal. The complete record, for the purpose of this Rule, does not include nonessential orders, summons, subpoenas, notices and similar papers."

Under the authority of Knight v. Resolute Insurance Co., Ky., 321 S.W.2d 255, we must agree with the appellee.

The appeal is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAWKINS v. HOSKINSON
(May 15, 1959)