Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

HARRY GREENFIELD, Indi v. dually and on Behalf of CLERMONT CRAVAT COMPANY, INC., Appellant-Respondent,

Orders of Appellate Division reversed and those of Special Term reinstated, as follows: The first cause of action is dismissed for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division; the defense of laches and estoppel is stricken from the amended answers to the second cause of action upon the ground that it is insufficient in law. Questions certified Nos. 1 and 4 answered in the negative; questions Nos. 2 and 3 not answered. No opinion.

Concur: Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD and VAN VOORHIS. Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges FROESSEL and BURKE dissent and vote to affirm the order of the Appellate Division holding the first cause of action sufficient.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GREENFIELD v. DENNER
(May 29, 1959)