Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Arthur L. Willcher, Washington, D.C., for
  • Mr. Richard W. Barton,
  • Counsel, for the District of Columbia, with whom
  • Chester H. Gray,
  • Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal
  • Counsel,
  • Hubert B. Pair,
  • Counsel, were on the brief, for
Judges
  • George Thomas Washington
  • John Anthony Danaher
  • Walter Maximillian Bastian
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Arthur L. Willcher, Washington, D.C., for
  • Mr. Richard W. Barton,
  • Counsel, for the District of Columbia, with whom
  • Chester H. Gray,
  • Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal
  • Counsel,
  • Hubert B. Pair,
  • Counsel, were on the brief, for
Judges
  • George Thomas Washington
  • John Anthony Danaher
  • Walter Maximillian Bastian
See more information ...
Smart Summary

Lawrence M. BLUMENTHAL, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment in a case where plaintiffs asked the court to declare as void the dedication of certain land for public streets and the acceptance of such dedication by the Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and to declare the title to the real property involved to be in the plaintiffs as successors in interest to the parties dedicating.

We find no error. Cf. Barnard v. Commissioners of the District of Columbia, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 404, 246 F.2d 685.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

BLUMENTHAL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
(Jun 4, 1959)