AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ELLEN HABER et al., Respondents, v. LOUIS FORBIDUSSI, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from so much of an order as granted respondents' motion for reargument of their motion to vacate an order of preclusion and as, upon reargument, vacated the order of preclusion and granted respondents leave to serve a bill of particulars. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The bill of particulars which was rejected by appellant was served 12 days after the effective date of the preclusion order. In our opinion there was no showing of gross laches or inexcusable neglect, nor was there any showing of prejudice. Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HABER v. FORBIDUSSI
(Jun 1, 1959)