Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

BULLUCK v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

POST CONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT — Purpose, Not to Grant Additional and Repetitious Appeal. It is not one of the purposes of the Post Conviction Procedure Act to grant an additional and fully repetitious appeal. Code (1958 Supp.), Art. 27, § 645A. p. 659

J.E.B. Decided June 9, 1959.

PER CURIAM.

This application for leave to appeal under the Post Conviction Procedure Act, Code (1958 Supp.), Article 27, § 645A through 27, § 645G, is a mere repetition of the points that were raised in the appeals of the petitioner reported as Bulluck v. State, 219 Md. 67. Even in a serious case of this nature — the petitioner having been sentenced to death in each of two separate convictions of rape — it would serve no useful purpose to set out the claims and contentions again as they were fully set forth, considered and determined in the above noted appeals.

It is not one of the purposes of the Post Conviction Procedure Act to grant an additional and fully repetitious appeal. Code (1958 Supp.), Article 27, § 645A.

Application denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BULLUCK v. WARDEN
(Jun 9, 1959)