AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KATHERINE HISTON et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. HEARN DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Appellant-Respondent. HELEN ABRAMS et al., Respondents-Appellants,

Order denying conditionally, plaintiffs' motion to vacate the notices of examination before trial unanimously reversed, on the law and in the court's discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant-respondent and motion denied without qualification. This is not a class action. Each plaintiff sues on his or her own behalf, but for convenience, all have joined together in one action. Defendant is entitled, if it deems it necessary, to examine each plaintiff with respect to matters that are relevant and material. The factual situation, particularly with respect to the affirmative defenses, may not be the same with respect to all plaintiffs.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, M.M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HISTON v. HEARN DEPARTMENT STORES, INC
(Jun 23, 1959)