Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

CURNYN v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

POST CONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT — Hearing under — Presence of Petitioner — Within Trial Court's Discretion. Whether a petitioner for relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act should be present at the hearing below is a matter within the discretion of the trial court. p. 672

J.E.B.

Decided October 20, 1959.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons set out in the opinion of the court below, the petition under the Post Conviction Procedure Act was properly denied, and application for leave to appeal is denied. Applicant contends, in his brief filed here, that he was illegally denied a right to be present at the hearing below, on his petition under the Act. We have held that the matter is within the discretion of the trial court. Plump v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, 220 Md. 662, 665, 153 A.2d 269, 270.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CURNYN v. WARDEN
(Oct 20, 1959)