Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

B. J. ATKINS, Appellant, v. AMERICAN CASUALTY AND LIFE INSURANCE CO., Appellee.

RENFRO, Justice.

The plaintiff, B. J. Atkins, resident of Tarrant County, brought suit in Tarrant County against American Casualty and Life Insurance Company, a life, health and accident insurance company, with residence in Dallas County, for medical, surgical and hospital expenses. The defendant filed a plea of privilege to be sued in Dallas County. The plaintiff's controvering affidavit claimed venue in Tarrant County under exception 28 of Article 1995, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St.

The proof showed that the medical services were rendered plaintiff in Bell County. The policy under which plaintiff claims was introduced in evidence. It shows name of insured to be Venus R. Atkins, and Billy Jack Atkins as dependent insured. The policy further provides that defendant will pay to the 'principal insured' for such losses as provided for in the policy, and further that the principal insured shall be considered the owner of the policy.

Defendant's plea of privilege was sustained.

In order to maintain venue in Tarrant County under exception 28, plaintiff had to establish that he was a policy holder. National Life Co. v. Rice, 140 Tex. 315, 167 S.W.2d 1021; Clark, Venue in Civil Actions, p. 166. The plaintiff failed to establish that he was a policy holder. In fact, the policy itself showed Venus R. Atkins, not plaintiff, to be the holder of the policy in question.

The order of the trial court is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ATKINS v. AM. CAS LIFE
(Nov 13, 1959)