Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

H. LEONARD KING et al., Appellants, v. IRVING M. SCHWARTZ, Doing Business as ACME TRADING COMPANY, Respondent

Per Curiam.

Either of the two tenants in common may maintain a proceeding to evict a holdover subtenant, with or without the consent of his tenant in common ( Hungerford v. Smith, 268 App. Div. 949; Smith v. Dairymen's League Co-operative Assn., 186 Misc. 82; Slade v. Hornick Co., 188 Misc. 455). The provisions of section 1415 of the Civil Practice Act were complied with in that the petitioner's interest in the property was correctly set out.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and a final order directed in favor of the landlords as prayed for in the petition, with costs.

Concur — STEUER, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEONARD v. SCHWARTZ
(Dec 3, 1959)