Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Smart Summary

Siddall v. Keating — Court of Appeals of New York (Dec. 30, 1959)

Factual and Procedural Background

The appeal was brought by Roger Siddall (appellant) against Cletus Keating et al. (respondents). The case was argued October 21, 1959, and decided December 30, 1959, in the Court of Appeals of the State of New York. The appeal is from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department. Counsel of record included Roger Siddall in person and O. John Rogge for the appellant, and Albert R. Connelly and David L. Foster for the respondents. A special referee named Isidor Wasservogel is noted in the appeal reference.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court of Appeals issued a short disposition: "Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion." No reasoning, analysis, or explanatory opinion accompanies the disposition in the provided text.

Holding and Implications

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Implications: The judgment of the lower court was affirmed and costs were awarded to the prevailing party. Because the Court issued no opinion, the disposition does not set forth legal reasoning or create an explicative precedent beyond the affirmance of the lower court's judgment.

ROGER SIDDALL, Appellant, v. CLETUS KEATING et al., Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIDDALL v. KEATING
(Dec 30, 1959)