AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

GRAHAM M. BRUSH, SR., Indi v. dually and as a Stockholder of SEATRAIN LINES, INC., Suing on His Own Behalf and On Behalf of Said Corporation and on Behalf of Defendant, SHIP CONTAINER CORPORATION, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Seatrain Lines, Inc., Respondent,

Order unanimously reversed on the facts and on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion to examine the defendants-appellants before trial is denied, with $10 costs. Although the complaint is verified it consists for the most part of generalized charges and conclusory allegations. The papers offered in support of the motion do not contain factual allegations of evidentiary value to establish charges of wrongdoing or improper conduct (see Van Aalten v. Mack, 7 A.D.2d 289; Price v. Groves, 258 App. Div. 35), nor are special circumstances shown which warrant such examination. (New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, rule XI, subd. 7; see Van Aalten v. Mack, supra.)

Concur — Rabin, J.P., M.M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRUSH v. BRITTAIN
(Jan 28, 1960)