Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Elmer J. Bennett argued the cause for the appellant (
  • Carpenter, Bennett
  • Morrissey, attorneys
  • Mr. Milton A. Dauber, on the brief). Mr. Samuel M. Lane, of the New York bar,
  • Mr. Donald B. Kipp argued the cause for the respondent (
  • Pitney, Hardin
  • Ward, attorneys
  • Mr. Robert P. Hazlehurst, Jr., on the brief).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Elmer J. Bennett argued the cause for the appellant (
  • Carpenter, Bennett
  • Morrissey, attorneys
  • Mr. Milton A. Dauber, on the brief). Mr. Samuel M. Lane, of the New York bar,
  • Mr. Donald B. Kipp argued the cause for the respondent (
  • Pitney, Hardin
  • Ward, attorneys
  • Mr. Robert P. Hazlehurst, Jr., on the brief).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY GROVER C. RICHMAN, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THESTATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE SPERRY HUTCHINSONCOMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division, 56 N.J. Super. 589, is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in its opinion. We add that we cannot find in the record sufficient evidence of specifically identifiable property subject to escheat or custody under the statutes, N.J.S. 2 A:37-13 et seq., or N.J.S. 2 A:37-29 et seq. For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

STATE v. THE SPERRY HUTCHINSON CO
(Jan 25, 1960)