AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

RHYISSA VAN RAAS, Respondent, v. ROSENBAUM-GRINELL, INC., Appellant

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was not entitled to recover the item of $37.50 for advertising costs for a new position, since, in any event, same might have been incurred in advertising for a new position when her employment terminated at the end of the stated season, in December.

The judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery to the sum of $780, with interest and costs thereon and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to plaintiff-respondent.

Concur — HECHT, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VAN RAAS v. ROSENBAUM-GRINELL, INC
(Feb 4, 1960)