Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RIGG v. CORRECTION DEPARTMENT, PAROLE BOARD DIVISION, STATE OF OHIO.

Criminal law — Pardon and Parole Commission — Action declaring paroled convict a parole violator — Not reviewable in habeas corpus action.

Per Curiam.

The period from March 1950, when petitioner was declared a parole violator, to October 1955, when he was released from the Indiana State Prison, at which time he was restored to parole by respondent, cannot be counted as time toward the serving of his maximum sentence. Section 2965.21, Revised Code.

The action of the Pardon and Parole Commission in declaring petitioner to be a parole violator before the expiration of the maximum period of his sentence and before his final release by that commission is not reviewable in a habeas corpus proceeding, even though petitioner has been returned to the penitentiary because of such action. In re Varner, 166 Ohio St. 340.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RIGGS v. PAROLE BOARD
(Feb 24, 1960)