Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MOUNTAIN LAKES, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PAULINE MAAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ETC.,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.PAULINE MAAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ETC., THIRD PARTYPLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

PER CURIAM.

Assuming the appellant's standing, we nonetheless affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division on the merits for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Goldmann in that court.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MOUNTAIN LAKES BD. OF EDUCATION v. MAAS
(Feb 22, 1960)