Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

WARD v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

POST CONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT — Search And Seizure, Validity Of — Preliminary Hearing, Alleged Lack Of. Neither the validity of a search and seizure, nor the alleged lack of a preliminary hearing, can be raised in a post conviction proceeding. p. 595

J.E.B.

Decided March 18, 1960.

PER CURIAM.

Application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of the court below. See also Ward v. State, 219 Md. 559. It is significant that, in that appeal, no contention was raised as to the validity of a search and seizure of his automobile, following his arrest for drunken driving. It cannot be raised in this proceeding. Mears v. Warden, 220 Md. 682. The same thing is true of the alleged lack of preliminary hearing. Cf. Culley v. Warden, 218 Md. 639.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WARD v. WARDEN
(Mar 18, 1960)