Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROGERS, APPELLANT v. ALVIS, WARDEN, APPELLEE. LOUM, APPELLANT

Appeal — Supreme Court — Judgment affirmed, when — Court of Appeals journal entry states case considered upon evidence — No bill of exceptions — Habeas corpus.

Per Curiam.

Each of these cases in habeas corpus was filed in the Court of Appeals. In each case the relief sought was denied. In each case it appears from the order of the court that the cause was considered upon the evidence. In neither case do we have any bill of exceptions or any other means of knowing what evidence was presented to the Court of Appeals. The judgments are therefore affirmed.

Judgments affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROGERS v. ALVIS
(Apr 6, 1960)