Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

FRANK DE CARLO, Respondent-Appellant, v. ELIZABETH FALCO et al., Respondents, and LOUIS PALLOS et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Judgment modified by dismissing the complaint as to defendants Pallos and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to defendants Pallos. The proof of Steve Pallos' conduct, precipitated as it was by an emergency not of his own making, was as a matter of law insufficient to create liability (see Meyer v. Whisnant, 307 N.Y. 369; Andersen v. Bee Line, 1 N.Y.2d 169). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DE CARLO v. FALCO
(Apr 29, 1960)