Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Millard Fillmore JAMISON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from denial by the district court of a motion to vacate, correct, or set aside sentence under Rule 35, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C. and under section 2255, Title 28, United States Code, came on to be heard.

Whereupon, the United States Attorney pointed out that the question presented has become moot for the reason that appellant, who was serving a sentence under the Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5005 et seq., has now been unconditionally discharged and released from the effect of such sentence.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JAMISON v. UNITED STATES
(Jun 3, 1960)