Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HAROLD H. WEISS, APPELLANT, v. HARRY GOLDMAN AND PAUL GOLDMAN, D/B/A GOLDMAN'S SERVICE STATION, AND ALEX LINGO, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in a personal injury action has appealed from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of negligence and awarding damages in the amount of $795.55 plus costs. This award was less than the plaintiff's total out-of-pocket expenses. Motion for new trial, made by the plaintiff, was denied and judgment was entered pursuant to the jury's verdict.

The sole point raised is whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiff's motion for a new trial upon the contention damages awarded were inadequate because the jury failed to consider all the elements of damages involved.

Having heard oral argument and considered the record and briefs, we conclude the judgment appealed should be affirmed upon the authority of Chomont v. Ward, Fla. 1958, 103 So.2d 635. See Glasser v. Leary, Fla. 1953, 67 So.2d 683.

HORTON, C.J., PEARSON, J., and MILLEDGE, STANLEY, Associate Judge, concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WEISS v. GOLDMAN
(May 26, 1960)