Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of CURTIS ROOSEVELT, Respondent, against JAMES M. POWER et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, et al., Appellants. In the Matter of CURTIS ROOSEVELT et al., Respondents, against JAMES M. POWER et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and JOSEPH ROSENBERG, Appellants.

Orders of the Appellate Division reversed and those of Special Term reinstated, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion at Special Term. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE. Judges FULD, FOSTER and BERGAN dissent and vote to affirm.

Designated pursuant to section 5 of article VI of the State Constitution in the temporary absence of Judge FROESSEL.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF ROOSEVELT v. POWER
(Jun 2, 1960)