APPLESTEIN v. UNITED BOARD AND CARTON CORP, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Daniel G. Kasen argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Kasen, Schnitzer Kasen, attorneys; Mr. Morris M. Schnitzer, of counsel). Mr. David Friedenberg argued the cause for the respondents Francis X. Conway, et al. ( Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier, attorney). Mr. Philip J. Albert argued the cause for the respondent Benjamin Applestein ( Messrs. Levy, Levy Albert, attorneys). Mr. Isadore Glauberman argued the case for the respondent United Board Carton Corporation ( Mr. Sheldon A. Weiss, on the brief). Mr. Raymond Chasan argued the cause for the respondents Martha U. Beuerlein, et al. ( Messrs. Levy, Lemken Margulies, attorneys; Mr. Seymour Margulies, of counsel).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Daniel G. Kasen argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Kasen, Schnitzer Kasen, attorneys; Mr. Morris M. Schnitzer, of counsel). Mr. David Friedenberg argued the cause for the respondents Francis X. Conway, et al. ( Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier, attorney). Mr. Philip J. Albert argued the cause for the respondent Benjamin Applestein ( Messrs. Levy, Levy Albert, attorneys). Mr. Isadore Glauberman argued the case for the respondent United Board Carton Corporation ( Mr. Sheldon A. Weiss, on the brief). Mr. Raymond Chasan argued the cause for the respondents Martha U. Beuerlein, et al. ( Messrs. Levy, Lemken Margulies, attorneys; Mr. Seymour Margulies, of counsel).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

BENJAMIN APPLESTEIN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. UNITED BOARD ANDCARTON CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SAUL L. EPSTEIN AND INTERSTATE CONTAINERCORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.MARTHA U. BEUERLEIN, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.