Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

ROSALIE A. VERDUCE et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. On the particular facts of this case, and for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division, issues of fact were presented which should have been submitted to a jury. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and FOSTER. Taking no part: Judge BURKE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VERDUCE v. BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION
(Jun 10, 1960)