Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

McGRATH ET AL. v. RHAY, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY.

Judgment vacated and case remanded for determination of specified questions of state law.

Reported below: 54 Wn.2d 508, 342 P.2d 607.

PER CURIAM.

The respondent's motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari is denied. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded for determination of the following questions of Washington law now involved in the case: (1) whether the case is moot as a habeas corpus proceeding; and (2) if it is, whether, to avoid mootness, it can properly be treated as an application for some other form of appropriate relief.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McGRATH v. RHAY
(Jun 27, 1960)