Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

AMOS PARRISH CO., INC., Respondent, v. MAX E. KRIEGEL, Appellant

Per Curiam.

The notation on the check that it is an advance against commissions to be earned does not necessarily make the advance a loan, despite the added words "to be adjusted every month". Nor was the asserted agreement for a flat salary during the training period inconsistent with the commission arrangement. Hence there were triable issues both on the plaintiff's cause of action and the counterclaim.

The judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

Concur — STEUER, J.P., HOFSTADTER and AURELIO, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PARRISH CO. v. KRIEGEL
(Jul 7, 1960)