Criminal Law — Practice — Habeas corpus — Alleged illegal search and seizure and arrest — Fabricated and hearsay evidence — Illegally obtained evidence — Misconduct by district attorney — Coerced confession — Compelled self-incrimination by police action.
In a habeas corpus proceeding, in which it appeared that the petition averred illegal search and seizure, illegal arrest, use of fabricated and hearsay evidence, use of illegally obtained evidence, improper remarks of the district attorney, coercion in the procuring of defendant's confession and compelled self-incrimination by police action (which matters were passed upon by the jury adversely to relator after hearing conflicting evidence), it was Held that the order of the court below dismissing the petition without a hearing should be affirmed.
Submitted June 20, 1960.
OPINION PER CURIAM, July 11, 1960:
The order of the court below dismissing relator's petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed on the opinion of Judge REIMEL of the Court of Common Pleas No. 5 of Philadelphia County as reported in 21 Pa. D. C. 2d 232.