Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

HENSON v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

POST CONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT — Hearing Under — Presence Of Petitioner Not Required At — Petitioner In Instant Case Was Represented At Hearing By Counsel. p. 675

POST CONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT — Request Made To Appellate Court For Copy Of Transcript Of Trial While Application For Leave To Appeal Was Pending Therein — Came Too Late — In Addition, Transcript Would Have Served No Useful Purpose. p. 675

J.E.B.

Decided October 13, 1960.

PER CURIAM.

The application for leave to appeal is denied for the reasons set forth in detail in the order of Judge Harlan denying post conviction relief. With respect to the claim of the applicant that he was entitled to attend the post conviction hearing and to testify, we observe that he was represented at the hearing by counsel. His presence thereat was not required. Deal v. Warden, 222 Md. 589, 158 A.2d 104 (1960). The request for a copy of the transcript of his trial addressed to this Court was not made until his application was pending in this Court. It therefore came too late. In addition an examination of the alleged grounds for relief clearly indicates that such transcript would have served no useful purpose.

Application denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HENSON v. WARDEN
(Oct 13, 1960)